It’s telling that Montezemolo is officially quitting Maranello Oct. 13, the day that the merged Fiat Chrysler will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange
. Montezemolo has reportedly grumbled that “Ferrari is now American,” according to Bloomberg
, and obviously he was chafing at the loss of some of his company’s autonomy.
Evidence of the fallout is apparent, even in the statements released by each of the men. By nature, press releases are as bland as skim milk. These pull no punches and invite you to read between the lines.
Luca and I have discussed the future of Ferrari at length. And our mutual desire to see Ferrari achieve its true potential on the track has led to misunderstandings which became clearly visible over the last weekend [When Ferrari struggled at the Italian Grand Prix].
While Montezemolo countered:
Ferrari will have an important role to play within the FCA Group in the upcoming flotation on Wall Street. This will open up a new and different phase, which I feel should be spearheaded by the CEO of the Group.
This is the end of an era and so I have decided to leave my position as chairman after almost 23 marvelous and unforgettable years, in addition to those spent at Enzo Ferrari’s side in the 1970s.
Marchionne appears to be pinning Montzemolo’s exit on Ferrari’s recent lack of success in Formula One. He has a point. Ferrari hasn’t won a title since it captured the 2008 Constructors Championship, and it’s in no position to win this year, despite having two former World Champions, Fernando Alonso and Kimi Raikkonen, piloting its race cars. The six-year drought is no doubt maddening for a team that’s the oldest and most successful in F1 history.
Still, eight of Ferrari’s 16 constructors crowns have come since Montezemolo took over as chairman, and Ferrari endured a much longer title drought in the 1980s and 1990s before Michael Schumacher and Ross Brawn reinvigorated the Scuderia.
Does Marchionne, or anyone for that matter, really believe Montezemolo has permanently lost his touch for the racing side of the business?
Conversely, Montezemolo’s comments pointed to the Wall Street IPO, which will signal a “new and different phase” for Ferrari. Whether it’s meant to or not, that sounds pretty ominous for Tifosi.
Clearly, Montezemolo is casting himself as part of the “true Ferrari” lineage and is suggesting that the company is now a division of Marchionne’s American empire.
He also referenced his time as Enzo Ferrari’s assistant in the 1970s, which led to his ascension to briefly head the racing team and more glory days for the Scuderia with Niki Lauda at the wheel.
Clearly, Montezemolo is casting himself as part of the “true Ferrari” lineage and suggesting that anything that changes for the worse after Oct. 13 is because the company is now a division of Marchionne’s American empire.
In reality, everything both men said is true. Will Ferrari become less autonomous? Yes. Is Marchionne going to start making Chrysler minivans in Maranello? Of course not. Should the Scuderia have been more successful in recent years in F1? Absolutely. The team spends gobs of money and fields two of the most talented drivers in the sport. But rule changes – especially F1′s move to new V6 turbo engines – have been hard on Ferrari. Still, teams go through slumps. Montezemolo wasn’t the problem.
No, the real problem is Montezemolo held firm that Ferrari shouldn’t make more cars. About 7,000 cars per year was his magic number. Marchionne, meanwhile, wants to ramp up Ferrari production to fulfill some of the pent-up demand – wait lists are notoriously long – and make more money.
History is written by the victors, and in the end, Marchionne and Montezemolo can both count this as a win. Yes, Montezemolo “resigned,” but his tenure at the helm will rank him among Ferrari’s greatest leaders. It’s Enzo, then Montezemolo.
Marchionne will now get his way. More Ferraris, but realistically, not that many more. Marchionne knows Ferrari’s value comes from its almost mythical status, and he won’t compromise that. The road-car business will be fine. And if he can get the Scuderia back to its familiar position at the front of the F1 grid, Italians won’t care where the stock is registered.
Other News and Views
Dodge slashes Viper price $15k
It’s a lot cheaper to buy a Viper than it was at the start of September, and the supercar now starts at $84,995. Adjusted for inflation, it’s in line with the price of a first-generation Viper, which started at $50,700 in 1992.
But when’s the last time a company reduced prices to adjust for inflation? That doesn’t happen. The price cut is a tacit admission the Viper isn’t performing as well as Dodge had hoped. Chrysler Group sales have been strong this year, but Viper sales have collapsed this summer. Obviously, Chrysler hopes lower prices will bring higher sales for the Viper.
Cadillac to launch semi-autonomous car in two years
Specifically, Cadillac will get a so-called “Super Cruise” feature that will enable the car to drive without driver input by controlling braking, speed and lane positioning. The model set to get the technology was not specified, though the new flagship, expected to be called the LTS, is a candidate.
Cadillac also announced it will equip the 2017 CTS with vehicle-to-vehicle communications capability, news that comes as the federal government moves toward potentially mandating that technology in some form on America’s roads.
Mercedes debuts AMG GT
Mercedes is going aggressively after the Porsche 911, launching two models that aim at Stuttgart’s core buyers. The GT S, which packs 503 hp, from a twin-turbo V8, launches early next year, followed by the 456-hp GT in mid-2016.
Mercedes’ new entry grades out well in all the measurable areas, but it faces a tough challenge in luring buyers from Porsche. Benz has definitely brought it with the new GT line. It’s a serious sports car. But it’s still about six months away. Your move, Porsche.